Community Living | Coupon | Police Scanner | E-News Signup | Archives | Merchant Directory | Dining Guide
Have a HOT TIP? Call 704-276-6587 Or E-mail us At
Advanced Search
Lincoln Herald | Lincolnton, NC

home : opinion : columnist May 19, 2022

9/15/2021 2:56:00 PM
A Conservative Point Of View
Confederate Monuments Go Down, Maoism Goes Up
Modern Jacobins poised to bring new Reign of Terror
(Row 1) Mort Künstler’s famous painting of Lee and Jackson at prayer is a masterpiece. (Painting by Mort Künstler) 
(Row 2) H.K. Edgerton flies the Southern Cross during a recent event in Tallahassee.  (Photo by Samuel Febres) 
(Row 3) Richmond’s beautiful statue of Robert E. Lee astride Traveller was torn down by heartless, brainless commies last week (Left) and (Right) Another image of Lee and Traveller is this beautiful painting. (Contributed Photos) 
(Row 4) (Left) Lee, truly a saintly man, was hailed by Churchill as “the noblest man America ever produced.” (Right) The heroic Jeb Stuart was the South’s own knight in shining armour. 
(Row 5) Before he died, the late black intellectual Walter Williams decried the destruction of Confederate monuments and the general attempt by the modern Maoistic Left to destroy America’s heritage and history.

(Row 1) Mort Künstler’s famous painting of Lee and Jackson at prayer is a masterpiece. (Painting by Mort Künstler) 

(Row 2) H.K. Edgerton flies the Southern Cross during a recent event in Tallahassee.  (Photo by Samuel Febres) 

(Row 3) Richmond’s beautiful statue of Robert E. Lee astride Traveller was torn down by heartless, brainless commies last week (Left) and (Right) Another image of Lee and Traveller is this beautiful painting. (Contributed Photos) 

(Row 4) (Left) Lee, truly a saintly man, was hailed by Churchill as “the noblest man America ever produced.” (Right) The heroic Jeb Stuart was the South’s own knight in shining armour. 

(Row 5) Before he died, the late black intellectual Walter Williams decried the destruction of Confederate monuments and the general attempt by the modern Maoistic Left to destroy America’s heritage and history.

We Welcome Your Letters

  • The Lincoln Herald welcomes Letters to the Editor from our readers about current articles, news issues or shout-outs about someone’s accomplishment in their community or school. All letters submitted must have the writer’s real name, phone number and address (we will not publish the address or phone number). Some letters may not be published if they contain any personal issues, bad language, etc. ALSO, If you would like to be considered for a guest column just let us know and we can give you all the details. We look forward to hearing from our readers! Email us at

From The Desk Of
Thomas Lark

It was a monumental mistake.

At the evident behest of the evil, usurping Ralph “Blackface” Northam, a grinning, gormless git who styles himself “governor” of what was once the great state of Virginia (rather like his counterpart in North Carolina, the equally satanic Roy Stupor), Richmond’s magnificent statue of the great Confederate general and hero, Robert E. Lee, was last week pulled down to the mindless cheers and asinine braying of modern-day Morlocks and Uruk-Hai.

This was a sad day for Virginia, for Dixie and for America. The work of famed French sculptor Antonin Mercié, in place on Monument Avenue for 130 years, was long considered one of the finest equine and military-themed statues in the world. It depicts Lee, solemn and godlike, astride Traveller, his faithful steed through many a campaign. It was one of four such statues depicting the Confederacy’s greatest heroes, all of them on Monument Avenue, of course. The others were of Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, Jefferson Davis, Jeb Stuart and Matthew Fontaine Maury.

Now, alas, they’re all gone. I suppose it won’t be long before the street is renamed “Northam Avenue.” And remember that wee Ralphie is that nice man so culturally and racially sensitive, he showed up in blackface at a party not that many years ago. Nice goin’, Ralphie.

It’s truly a Yeatsian problem: the irreconcilability of a glorious past with an ignominious present. Though dead, Dixie and the Confederacy serve to remind the Left of something unconquerable: that spirit of justified rebellion in a worthy cause; a defiant David standing up to a tyrannical, too-powerful Goliath. 

Truth carved in stone
Why else remove these unoffending statues––these noble sentinels of a hallowed heritage and history that stood on Monument Avenue for generations, hurting no one? Because “values change,” Northam sappily said last week.

Hogwash. Absolute tommyrot and taradiddle. The sanctimony of simpletons and relativism of reprobates.

 “The truth is the truth, and it cannot change, or else it’s not the truth,” as Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre observed decades ago.

Lefties, of course, being possessed of genuine mental illness, will never admit this. For them, truth is fluid and ever changing. Lefties believe in “unending progress,” whereas conservatives know that truth is always on the Right and carved in stone.

And talking of stone, yes, the monuments are gone. Between last year and last week, all five statues have been removed at the barbaric demand of the “Black Lives Matter” terrorist organisation and other such neo-Jacobin numbskulls that are so stupid, they’ve even attacked and removed statues of abolitionists Up North. Politicians of every sorry stripe (mostly Demonrats but Republicans, too, and they’re all liberal, of course) have caved in cowardice to a strident, destructive, moronic minority with members funded by the Chinese Communist Party and Georg Soros.

I well recall when first I encountered BLM. One of its vacuous vandals sprayed graffiti on the famed monument on the Battery overlooking Charleston Harbour. The words scrawled upon the statue read:

“Black lives mater.” (sic)

Bwa-hahahahahahaha! Perhaps it was a crude advertisement for some soul-food shack; one specialising in ’maters. Good grief.

As author Edward Griffin (problematic, but even a broken clock…) and other social critics have pointed out for more than five decades, the CCP knows very well that race and the concomitant problem of historic discrimination form America’s Achilles heel. China is a homogeneous society (or so it strives to be), and it is racist (and brutally misogynistic, too) to its rotten core. It has historically harshly discriminated against biracial people (to be fair, so have Japan and other Asian countries), and it today is intent on a bona fide genocide against the Uyghurs, a Mohammedan people that the CCP despises. There are some 13 million of these mixed Turkish-Asian-European people in northwestern China, many of them possessed of blonde hair and blue eyes: qualities that the deeply racist Chinese communists despise.

Liberal hypocrisy

Yes, just as Demonrats are guilty of the very sins of which they loudly and delusionally accuse others, the Chinese are themselves of course guilty of the same thing of which they accuse America: racism––a problem this country actually solved by law in the 1960’s and a thing gone for all intents by the ’70’s and ’80’s. Only the race-hustlers seek to get it off life-support. And as Morgan Freeman has said, that problem can be dealt with quite easily:

“Stop talking about it.”

But China and its Demonrat puppets don’t want that. Thanks to its heavily censored news and communications black-outs (they censor Google in China, yet said tech giant is very much in bed with the CCP, here in America), not many know of the Chinese concentration camps for Uyghurs and Christians. And in a nation with more than a billion souls, such a demographic shell game is easily played.

It’s a classic case of “Do as we say, not as we do.” And so China funds “Black Lives Matter,” Antifa and all manner of other gangs of spoilt brats––“up-talking,” computer-addled, culturally and historically illiterate, subliterate simps, all living in their parents’ basements. And said looney-libby brats in turn also heavily subsidise their would-be revolution of burning, looting, shooting, pillaging and generally tearing down society and destroying Western civilisation with a boatload of Mom and Dad’s money.

Make no mistake: China is the enemy, and the CCP absolutely wants to destroy us and our civilisation. Hence China’s incessant harping on American racism. They want to undermine us and to make us ashamed of what is all too often admittedly a chequered past. Beijing does a marvellous ventriloquist act. They usually have their puppets in said terrorist organisations and liberal political parties, and innumerable pop culture idiots appear to do their talking for them.

1 - Rock Fitness 2021

Yes, the past is a mixed bag. But that’s usually how it is for any great nation. Great nations, capable of great good, are also capable of great wrong. That goes back to ancient Greece and Rome, for God’s sake. And you cannot judge the peoples of the past by modern standards. Try to impose a modern prism over the great figures of history, and you’ll get them wrong every time. Such people must be understood within the context of their times.

The Chinese and their Leftist water-carriers have the past, good and bad, of America and the West in their sights. Somehow, said statues and other symbols were what they were, where they were, for long generations. But suddenly in 2016, when the common working man elected his ironic champion, a billionaire named Donald Trump, these symbols, quite abruptly, were declared verboten, and they had to go. Co-incidence? Of course not. Attacking its past is a fine way to undermine a civilisation. Go dig up George Orwell or l’il Joey Stalin, and see what they have to say about that. Control the past, as Uncle Joe knew, and you’ll control a people’s present and future.

The Chinese and the liberals mean to attack our past. All of it. Our presidents (illegitimate as they are), our kings (wonderful as they were), our explorers, our artists, etc. After the whiny, whinging complaints of looney-libby agitators last week, a California college chucked its Western civilisation course, which had been in place for nearly 80 years, as it too heavily focused on the myriad accomplishments of the Greco-Roman world and was thus decried as “racist” by said pig-ignorant, brainless brats.

And of course one big subject forms a handy, barn door-broad target for these villains: the War Between the States. No, only an idiot calls it the “Civil War.” That’s too unclear. Which civil war? The English? The Spanish? No, serious scholars have always called it what it was––the War Between the States.

In a civil war, there is a contest between duelling factions for control of the government and its capital. But the War of Northern Aggression was not that. It was indeed the War for Southern Independence. Richmond was the capital of our nation, Dixieland.

Of all the wars in the history of human conflict, the War Between the States is perhaps the most nettlesome when it comes to explaining its many causes. It’s a complex war, and it defies easy understanding. But Lefties––being essentially overgrown brats, who desperately need to go back to elementary school––lack the necessary mental heft to hoik such intellectual weights. They want to reduce the war to easy sound-bites, to the single cause of slavery, hence their convenient excuse for destroying all Confederate monuments and every last vestige of Southern history and heritage.

No, it doesn’t help that racist rednecks shamefully hijacked the Southern Cross––the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia––circa 1960, a century after the Confederacy’s birth, misappropriating it in a misguided struggle against federal efforts to end American apartheid. But bad men quite often hijack good symbols and misuse and besmirch them. Decades ago, the evil KKK hijacked the American flag, the Bible and even the Cross of Christ. Should they be banned, too?

Imagine Merkel’s awful government in Berlin telling Bavaria that it could no longer use its distinctive, blue-and-white checked flag, images of King Ludwig II and other such symbols of regional pride. You can’t imagine that, can you? It’s about like that.

Again, the mixed bag: Yes, slavery is cited in the infamous South Carolina Articles of Secession, written by Christopher Memminger in 1860. But the baker’s dozen or so Confederate states often pulled in as many different directions, and that lack of centralised cohesion, which Lincoln enjoyed and Davis lacked, helped speed the South’s downfall. Many Southerners supported slavery. But many others opposed it.

Yes, the notorious Nathan Bedford Forrest was a slaver. Hey, if you wanted to remove a statue of him, I’d help you do it. With friends like that, we don’t need enemies; a personally brave man, Forrest, but possessed of other reprehensible qualities. Yes, the defeated South, in the wake of the war, rather like the defeated Germany of a century ago, ended up going nuts and unfairly blaming the lowest man on the totem pole for all of its problems, culminating in a century of apartheid. All very tragic. 

Blame the damned Yankees
But who and what could’ve stopped the Jim Crow era and all its atrocities? The North. The men of the North, occupying the postwar prostrate South, could’ve put a stop to such things. But they didn’t do so, because they didn’t care, and they turned a blind eye. Reconstruction ended too soon, and the North pulled out prematurely. The South was defeated and destitute, and that was good enough for Northern Big Business, which had begun the war in the first place, all with a mind to crushing Southern competition. That’s capitalism for you. Sure, it’s not as bad as communism, but it can crush you just as easily.

No, the sine qua non of the war was not slavery. As Joseph Johnston noted after the war, had the South wanted to preserve its “peculiar institution,” it could’ve easily done so by “simply laying down our arms in 1861.”

Nobody remembers the Corwin Amendment. It’s not taught in the public schools, which really are Northern-sponsored Marxist indoctrination camps, and of course all the textbooks are printed Up North. Proposed in the late winter of 1861––mere weeks before it became necessary for Pierre Beauregard to fire upon occupying Yankee forces spoiling for war at Fort Sumter, just off the coast of Charleston––this failed, never-ratified constitutional amendment was intended by Northern members of Congress to keep the South on side by guaranteeing the safety of slavery and carving that into legal stone.

But the South wisely rejected this sop to Cerberus. Why? Because she simply wanted her independence from the money-worshipping North, with all its filthy, inhuman industrialisation and Blakean “dark, satanic mills.”

The South was also tired of paying for Northern infrastructure––roads, railroads, bridges, etc.––that Southerners themselves would never use. The gross domestic product of Louisiana was being used to fund Washington’s war department. Factor in the high-percentage tariffs on Southern goods, and there you are.

Lincoln addressed a crowd in Pennsylvania weeks before the war, saying:

“The South may need to be taught a lesson.”

After Southern states began seceding, Dishonest Abe wailed, “We can’t let the South go! Who will pay for the government?”

And after war was well under way and the North was losing, Lincoln, a notorious anti-Catholic bigot, complained, “We have this whole war to blame on popery!”

Much is made of Lincoln’s emancipation of the slaves. But the racist Lincoln actually cared not a jot for blacks. He was simply trying to strike at the South economically.

And had the South won, its black population would have been immeasurably better off. Why? No Jim Crow, pure and simple. Britain (the South’s ally) and France were very busy running the world in those days. Following a Southern victory (perhaps a coup de grâce at a different-outcome Gettysburg), Britain and France would’ve no longer tolerated trading with a slave state, and they would have summarily forced the South to end slavery, just as they had done themselves decades earlier. Slavery was already on the way out throughout the South anyway, and black freedom would have then ensued throughout the new nation of Dixie before the end of the 1860’s. The South would have been obliged to industrialise, perhaps on a smaller scale than that of the North, and it would have evolved into a kind of Southern version of Canada.

That’s the sort of stuff those pesky textbooks don’t teach you, kids. As historian Jack Marlar of the Sons of Confederate Veterans––a 125-year-old heritage and honour society, devoted to education, scholarships and historic preservation and comprised of blood descendants of honourably discharged Southern soldiers––has on many occasions observed:

“No nation or society in human history ever went to war over slavery.”

No, it wasn’t that. The chief casus belli of the War Between the States was something else beginning with an “S”: secession, which, per the Constitution, is actually legal. Union membership was always understood thitherto as voluntary, not a matter of coercion. Another word starting with an “S” is sectionalism. By 1860, the American Empire was already too big to be properly governable, and a North-South break was inevitable. That, after all, is the nature of empires. They tend to break up. Northerners and Southerners had already hated each other to a surprising extent for generations. They were from Up There, and we were from Down Here. Immature, to be sure, but human nature often is.

And there were real differences. The South was more rural and more religious. And true enough, its people by and large were nowhere near as well-educated as their Northern counterparts. Hardscrabble dirt farmers tended to be subliterate or illiterate, and only the members of the slave-owning planter class––less than a tenth of the population––tended to be properly cultured, well-travelled and well-educated.

Left alone and allowed its independence, which could’ve been achieved as a quite amiable separation and without violence but for Northern Big Business and its stooge, Lincoln, the South could have become quite remarkable. It certainly never would have permitted the legalisation of baby-killing and unnatural “marriage,” both of which are devilish Yankee inventions. Blacks in particular and the South broadly, both freed of the mutually degrading effects of slavery, would have enjoyed a real renaissance, with the former quickly becoming a class of educated professionals, as writer Harry Turtledove and actor Richard Dreyfuss outline in their excellent book, The Two Georges, all about a very different and far better America, in which the completely unnecessary American Revolution never took place.

That’s right. Unnecessary. And no American Revolt, no War Between the States. Alas, most Americans don’t realise such things because they’re inclined toward intellectual sloth anyway, and the schools don’t teach this stuff. To a great extent, Americans are brainwashed; fed propagandistic lies, cradle to grave, and distracted by panem et circenses. 

How it began
The nine-year French and Indian War began in 1754, when a brash, young upstart named George Washington, overeager and keen to make a name for himself, shot a French officer on the frontier. The British and their American cousins fought side by side, with the former securing the peace and safety of the latter against their French and Amerindian foes.

But the Americans soon acted like petulant, childish ingrates. Securing said peace came at a price very dear for the British purse, to say nothing of the British soldiers who died to protect Americans. A bit of taxes would’ve at least defrayed the financial costs. But the selfish Americans in the Masonic hotbeds of Boston and Philadelphia didn’t want to pay these modest taxes, as they were greedy and worshipped not God but money. They rejected British proposals time after time (taxes on paper, stamps, tea and so on), soon leaving the British no choice. And all this was despite the facts that Americans paid mere pennies a year in taxes, and their British counterparts back home shelled out 14 times as much. Nevertheless, the cabal of Boston-based, virulently anti-Christian Masons decided to foment a revolution, and they eventually dragged an unwilling South into war along with them.

Here’s a parallel: imagine your house catches fire. As a good neighbour, I come over with my garden hose and help you put it out. But I’ve incurred a stiffish water bill as a result, and I’d like your help paying it. Only fair, right? But instead, when I ask you for some money, you angrily refuse and punch me in the nose. You then call on your big friend to beat me up.

Crazy, right? Well, that’s what happened. France became the Colonies’ indispensable ally and won the victory at Yorktown, thus securing American independence. And the parallel is exact.

Who did the runaway slaves and Amerindians fight for? Mostly for the British. The British promised freedom to the former, and they delivered, with countless blacks going to Bermuda, the Caribbean and Canada after the war. To the latter, the British promised land around the Great Lakes. Alas, victory was not given to the just in that war, so the land deal never came to fruition. The escaped slaves that the Americans recaptured were then sold back into slavery, and the Amerindians became the victims of genocide and the massive theft of their lands. Thus 1775 was about nothing––nothing but money.

Americans, who as colonials had enjoyed enormous freedoms and a purely notional, indeed benevolent British government that stayed out of their lives, suddenly found themselves saddled with a host of new, stupid laws, an intrusive American government apparatus, imposing enormous taxes to pay for said unnecessary war (go dig up the men of the Whiskey Rebellion and ask them how much they liked Georgie Washington) and a crushing debt so big that the American economy didn’t even begin to right itself until the 1820’s, as the late conservative columnist Joe Sobran pointed out years ago. 

Selling the populace on the con job of American “independence” was no easy task. The printing presses of serial adulterer Ben Franklin worked overtime, and drunken madman Thomas Paine argued the Revolution’s cause in his doggerel tracts. But after the war, many people began to realise that they’d been had. A repentant Paine was among them, and he called out Washington for deep hypocrisy. For his efforts, jumpin’ Georgie threw old Tom under a jail, where he died, broken, penniless and forgotten.

But 1861 was about something, by God. And that was freedom. If you consider that America was founded in slavery, greed and money-worship and that the Revolution and resulting government were wholly illegitimate, then seceding from that evil government had to be a good thing. Thus the War Between the States must be properly understood, and the Confederacy and its heroes deserve to be remembered and their statues unmolested.

Indeed, such desecration is against the law. If only the existing laws upon our books were properly enforced!

A brilliant polymath, famed for his oceanographic achievements, Maury was, shall we say, ambivalent about slavery. He never owned any, but he appears to have advocated its spread, theorising about eventually linking Dixie with South America before his plans were dashed when Pedro II, the saintly emperor of Brasil, stopped him.

Stuart was the South’s flamboyant cavalier. The South needed a knight in shining armour, and Stuart was happy to oblige. How he felt about slavery is not known.

But Davis, Lee and Jackson, to a man, all opposed it. Such things used to be more commonly known. Forty years ago, when we were taught such material in school, Lee was related to us as a noble man who was forced to fight for a cause that wasn’t always noble. So we were led to believe. It would be 20 years before I learned the full truth about this deeply Christian man.

On Fox News last week, Laura Ingraham, who is smart enough to know better, cited Lee as “a slave-owner” and left it at that. Shame on her. In reality, Lee freed his slaves a generation before it was hip to do so. He spoke out passionately against slavery.

Jackson supported a black Sunday School class. He even managed to send it money even during the war. And Davis adopted a young black boy, also in the midst of the war.

Are these the acts of racist men? Only an idiot would think so. Longstreet, Beauregard and countless other Southern leaders opposed slavery as well. Abolitionism was not unique to the North.

The Catholic priests and bishops throughout the South neatly encapsulated my own view. To a man, they all opposed slavery yet favoured secession anyway.

Again, we see the phenomenon of the mixed bag. Most of the slave-owners of New Orléans freed their slaves in the 1850’s, after a call to pray for that intention on the part of that Catholic city’s priests. After the war, Wilmington was known for a shameful record of race relations, including the riots of 1898. But such things never happened in Savannah, which was known for its racial harmony both before and after the war, as John Berendt writes in Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.

Talking of books, the efforts of Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo will show you the truth about the much-mythologised Lincoln. And Brian Cisco’s War Crimes Against Southern Civilians will make your blood boil.

In our modern times, H.K. Edgerton left his post as head of the Asheville Chapter of the NAACP to join the Sons of Confederate Veterans. A noted apologist for the Southern Cause, Edgerton––known for his educational talks, in which he decries Lincoln’s racism––is among the black men in the SCV’s ranks. Another is retired school principal Nathan Winbush.

Black social critics drs. Thomas Sowell and Shelby Steele have noted that slavery has bugger-all to do with the plight of modern American blacks. But the so-called reforms of the LBJ administration have everything to do with it.

The late Walter Williams, a noted black intellectual and conservative, wrote many times in favour of the Confederacy. Before he died last year, Williams, a famous economics professor, wrote:

“The Confederacy has been the excuse for some of today’s rioting, property destruction and grossly uninformed statements.”

He also castigated the treasonous general, the feeble-minded and China-coddling Mark Milley, for wasting time in efforts to rename army bases named for Confederate generals. Milley also betrayed Donald Trump––still our real president, not the senile Manchurian Candidate currently usurping the presidency––and for that the moronic, malevolent Milley and all his ilk deserve summary courts-martial and lifetime prison sentences.

And I’d say lengthy prison sentences for the vandals and Orcs who lay waste our cities and destroy our monuments would only be just and fair. Serve ’em right. 

Look away…
But alas, justice is dead in this country, beset as we are by kangaroo courts, usurping impostors and gutless leaders, too many bought by Beijing. We shall never see justice. This is no longer our country. It’s well on the way to becoming a satrapy of China. Look at Richmond, Atlanta and other such modern messes, and you can see what some 300,000 dead Southern men and boys tried to prevent.

All we can do is “look away, look away…”

I’m irresistibly reminded of Lee’s last words:

“Strike the tent.”

I’m sorry, Marse Robert. We have failed you. This is no longer Dixie, and indeed it’s no longer America. The best we can do is get off this Titanic. America cannot be saved, only abandoned. Get to southern Chile, if you can, as many Christian families from America and Germany have done, even just this year so far. There perhaps you can reconstitute a version of Dixie. I have it on good authority that the locals will love and respect you for it.

Until then, cherish Dixie and carry the Confederacy in your hearts.

At least that no man can take from you.

---The views and opinions expressed in “A Conservative Point of View” are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Lincoln Herald.

Have Us E-mail You The Latest News
Click Here

Your #1 Local Source for News, Sports, Opinion, Obituaries, Religion, Classifieds, Events, Photos, Community, Coupons, and more!

Serving Lincoln, Catawba, Gaston and Cleveland counties including the areas of Lincolnton, Denver, Maiden, Stanley, Alexis, Vale, Crouse, Iron Station, High Shoals and Cherryville.

Not a newspaper, not a magazine, we’re online – on your computer at home or work, on your smartphone… with news and more 24 hours a day, seven days a week, every day of the year including holidays.

To Make Sure You Always
Get The Latest Updates,
If You Haven’t Already:

Like Our Facebook Page and
Click On SEE FIRST at

Also Follow Us On Twitter 

Related Stories:
• Readers Laud Lark For Confederate Monument Piece

1 - First Federal standard ad 550

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

HomeNewsState NewsReligionOpinionSportsObituariesExtrasCommunityClassifiedsSubmitLife

Terms and Use | Merchant Directory | Dining Guide
Site Design and Content
Copyright Lincoln Herald, LLC 2011-2021


Software © 1998-2022 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved